November 10, 2016 at 5:25 am
Ed Wagner (11/10/2016)
Eirikur Eiriksson (11/10/2016)
GilaMonster (11/10/2016)
sql 2005 to oracle11g database upgrade please send the step by step process
Um, ok...
Wooosh and no clue
~~~~\o/~~~/\~~~~
😎
Heh - Did you direct them to the installation documentation for Oracle?
No. To SAP customer support.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 10, 2016 at 6:45 am
GilaMonster (11/10/2016)
Ed Wagner (11/10/2016)
Eirikur Eiriksson (11/10/2016)
GilaMonster (11/10/2016)
sql 2005 to oracle11g database upgrade please send the step by step process
Um, ok...
Wooosh and no clue
~~~~\o/~~~/\~~~~
😎
Heh - Did you direct them to the installation documentation for Oracle?
No. To SAP customer support.
Whoa - My guess is that they have quite a long road ahead of them.
November 10, 2016 at 8:03 am
GilaMonster (11/10/2016)
sql 2005 to oracle11g database upgrade please send the step by step process
Um, ok...
Come now, the steps to do this are quite simple, really, anybody could do it.
0. Update your resume
1. Put want ad out looking for a highly experienced Oracle DBA / Developer with some MS SQL experience for a consultant position
2. Hire said Oracle DBA at an hourly rate of ~$100/hr
3. Set contract length @ 6 months
4. ???
5. PROFIT!
😀
To be honest, I think I might be low on the hourly rate, I was estimating based on what the Oracle DBA I work with roughly brings in per year.
November 10, 2016 at 8:28 am
jasona.work (11/10/2016)
GilaMonster (11/10/2016)
sql 2005 to oracle11g database upgrade please send the step by step process
Um, ok...
Come now, the steps to do this are quite simple, really, anybody could do it.
0. Update your resume
1. Put want ad out looking for a highly experienced Oracle DBA / Developer with some MS SQL experience for a consultant position
2. Hire said Oracle DBA at an hourly rate of ~$100/hr
3. Set contract length @ 6 months
4. ???
5. PROFIT!
😀
To be honest, I think I might be low on the hourly rate, I was estimating based on what the Oracle DBA I work with roughly brings in per year.
I get your reference in steps 4 and 5. 😛
The last time I worked with an Oracle installation was back in the 9i days. The documentation for the installation was several hundred pages long and did not include installation of Oracle Application Server, which was a separate machine. I'm glad I wasn't the DBA. 😀
November 10, 2016 at 8:57 am
Jeff Moden (11/9/2016)
Lynn Pettis (11/9/2016)
Jeff, I actually excepted you to have some interesting comments about the code I emailed you, or didn't you get it?Ah. sorry. I did see it and did start to look through it and got side tracked. Who wrote it?
Not really sure, but apparently the person currently responsible has a canned response ready when I make suggestions for minor changes, "Someone else wrote this code before me." With absolutely no comments in the code, would know. I have slowly started adding comments to my code and hopefully it is starting to look more like the code you write.
I don't know why people think that the code is the documentation. COBOL came close to that, but even that needs more comments where complex logic is involved.
November 10, 2016 at 11:21 am
Capt'n!
The Bird o' Prey is gone!
They must've cloaked!
First thing I thought of when I saw this:
MSI (c) (28:2C) [14:35:09:178]: Cloaking enabled.
November 10, 2016 at 12:07 pm
jasona.work (11/10/2016)
Capt'n!The Bird o' Prey is gone!
They must've cloaked!
First thing I thought of when I saw this:
MSI (c) (28:2C) [14:35:09:178]: Cloaking enabled.
You are a bad, bad boy!
November 10, 2016 at 12:23 pm
Brandie Tarvin (11/10/2016)
jasona.work (11/10/2016)
Capt'n!The Bird o' Prey is gone!
They must've cloaked!
First thing I thought of when I saw this:
MSI (c) (28:2C) [14:35:09:178]: Cloaking enabled.
You are a bad, bad boy!
Hey!
I'm not knocking the guys question, I'm making fun of the fact that some wag at MS put something like that in an installer log file!
Plus, I loved watching Star Trek (TOS a lot, TNG some, DS9 a little, Voyager some, Enterprise only 1 season);-)
November 10, 2016 at 12:25 pm
Lynn Pettis (11/10/2016)
Jeff Moden (11/9/2016)
Lynn Pettis (11/9/2016)
Jeff, I actually excepted you to have some interesting comments about the code I emailed you, or didn't you get it?Ah. sorry. I did see it and did start to look through it and got side tracked. Who wrote it?
Not really sure, but apparently the person currently responsible has a canned response ready when I make suggestions for minor changes, "Someone else wrote this code before me." With absolutely no comments in the code, would know. I have slowly started adding comments to my code and hopefully it is starting to look more like the code you write.
I don't know why people think that the code is the documentation. COBOL came close to that, but even that needs more comments where complex logic is involved.
As you know, my general rule of thumb is that if you remove all of the code, the comments that remain should allow someone to create a functional flowchart. My original thought when I saw the code was "typical code by someone that doesn't know, doesn't care, or both".
--Jeff Moden
November 10, 2016 at 12:32 pm
Jeff Moden (11/10/2016)
Lynn Pettis (11/10/2016)
Jeff Moden (11/9/2016)
Lynn Pettis (11/9/2016)
Jeff, I actually excepted you to have some interesting comments about the code I emailed you, or didn't you get it?Ah. sorry. I did see it and did start to look through it and got side tracked. Who wrote it?
Not really sure, but apparently the person currently responsible has a canned response ready when I make suggestions for minor changes, "Someone else wrote this code before me." With absolutely no comments in the code, would know. I have slowly started adding comments to my code and hopefully it is starting to look more like the code you write.
I don't know why people think that the code is the documentation. COBOL came close to that, but even that needs more comments where complex logic is involved.
As you know, my general rule of thumb is that if you remove all of the code, the comments that remain should allow someone to create a functional flowchart. My original thought when I saw the code was "typical code by someone that doesn't know, doesn't care, or both".
What bothered me was that I was expected to just quickly understand what the code was doing. I did provide a small change regarding capturing the values from the parameter table that is cleaner and easier to understand.
November 10, 2016 at 12:38 pm
jasona.work (11/10/2016)
Brandie Tarvin (11/10/2016)
jasona.work (11/10/2016)
Capt'n!The Bird o' Prey is gone!
They must've cloaked!
First thing I thought of when I saw this:
MSI (c) (28:2C) [14:35:09:178]: Cloaking enabled.
You are a bad, bad boy!
Hey!
I'm not knocking the guys question, I'm making fun of the fact that some wag at MS put something like that in an installer log file!
Plus, I loved watching Star Trek (TOS a lot, TNG some, DS9 a little, Voyager some, Enterprise only 1 season);-)
I'm with you. IMHO:
TOS = Very Good
TNG = Great
DS9 = No
Voyager = Only after 7 of 9 / the Borg came into the picture
Enterprise = No
November 10, 2016 at 1:10 pm
Ed Wagner (11/10/2016)
TOS = Very GoodTNG = Great
DS9 = No
Voyager = Only after 7 of 9 / the Borg came into the picture
Enterprise = No
My only difference there would be
DS9 = From the Dominion war onward was good
Voyager = No (Can't stand Janeway)
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
November 10, 2016 at 2:36 pm
ThomasRushton (11/10/2016)
ehh.... well, the CTPs for SQL2012 ("Denali") started in November 2010, and the RTM was Q1 2012, so it's possible to have over 4 years experience with SQL Server 2012...
How many did you count since Q1 2012?
_____________
Code for TallyGenerator
November 10, 2016 at 2:44 pm
Sergiy (11/10/2016)
ThomasRushton (11/10/2016)
ehh.... well, the CTPs for SQL2012 ("Denali") started in November 2010, and the RTM was Q1 2012, so it's possible to have over 4 years experience with SQL Server 2012...How many did you count since Q1 2012?
Four years and three quarters.
4 3/4 > 4
November 10, 2016 at 4:57 pm
Hugo Kornelis (11/10/2016)
Sergiy (11/10/2016)
ThomasRushton (11/10/2016)
ehh.... well, the CTPs for SQL2012 ("Denali") started in November 2010, and the RTM was Q1 2012, so it's possible to have over 4 years experience with SQL Server 2012...How many did you count since Q1 2012?
Four years and three quarters.
4 3/4 > 4
How old are you?
I'm not asking about the number. It's about the way you answer such question.
"4 years and 9 month" is still 4 years.
"More than 4 years" means 5, 6, 7 years and more.
_____________
Code for TallyGenerator
Viewing 15 posts - 56,536 through 56,550 (of 66,000 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply