Viewing 5 posts - 31 through 35 (of 35 total)
You are correct, it's a tradeoff however it's handled, unless you have the resources to create a massive failover node, (which, by definition most of the time does nothing).
So far,...
July 25, 2006 at 1:10 pm
#651452
ok, thanks for the clarification.
Worst case scenario, only the failover (b node) is running.
With hard configured memory you've got to allocate chunks of memory to each instance running...
July 25, 2006 at 12:02 pm
#651439
If I understand this right, you're proposing:
4 node cluster
Node A is the active primary 8GB ram AWE enabled /PAE
Node B is the passive failover 8GB ram AWE enabled /PAE
Node C...
July 25, 2006 at 10:10 am
#651388
Are you using microsoft clustering services?
if so, when you setup the sql server cluster, you specified an IP address that you will need to rerun setup to alter. SQL...
July 6, 2006 at 11:37 am
#647806
Good article! I've used something like this in the past for database transfers.
if you're going to use this in a production environment, be sure the first couple of times you...
May 18, 2006 at 1:30 pm
#638857