Iordan Slavov (11/2/2007) wrote:

Do you mind to share some code? Thanks.

Also, I have a unpleasant problem with ADP and SS2000/05. When trying to run behind an Access form (in VBA)...

Steve,

You addressed your question to Wayne, but I would like to reply. I have been using SQL Server 2005 for over a year. I have about a hundred...

I use .mdbs for front-end applications for many of the reasons mentioned above. My backend databases are SQL Server 2005. While I am very comfortable using EM and...

Datetime2? I agree. Yuck. Why not BigDatetime? We have SmallDatetime...

My agency can't afford to buy me a SQL Server magazine. Yet I'm still the only gal around who has to (really: GETS TO) create the databases which my...

I thought the article did a great job of explaining UDTs, and then explaining the pros and cons. I was aware of the pros, but not so aware of...

Jeaux wrote: "My question is why couldn't you rewrite the example..." I have a different answer to this question. I once had a stored procedure with a similar...

I want to reply to the note posted above:

"But I haven't been able to define, nor have I ever heard anyone else define, a useful generalized definition...

I have experimented with distinguishing 'code'/lookup tables from other tables in two different ways: 1) adding text at the beginning of the table name and 2) adding text at the...

I, too, am tickled by this great discussion. I appreciate the author who wrote such a clear original article and then seeing the different ways other people would solve...

I liked this article just because I'm interested in how other people name their 'stuff'. Occasionally I will try out a new idea, and this article shared ideas in...

I appreciate this article for it's objective voice. I've long felt the same way, but it feels like nice vindication when someone else posts similar thoughts.

For most of my...

Fixed! Wouldn't you just know it. After strugling forever with this problem, I figured out just one minute after posting this post that the problem was that under...