Forum Replies Created

Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)

  • RE: Working Around 2005 Maintenance Plans

    Ah, I'd not noticed it there - I'd been looking at it from the maintenance plan editor, where you don't appear to be able to select, only create

  • RE: Working Around 2005 Maintenance Plans

    Ain't it always the way 🙂

    Yes, the lack of support for cleaning a directory tree is a strange omission. I believe we ended up writing a tool to generate the...

  • RE: Working Around 2005 Maintenance Plans

    Hi,

    I might have missd something, but couldn't you just use a Maintenance Cleanup Task to delete old backups? That's how we have it set up here, and it seems to...

  • RE: AWE on a 4GB machine

    Thanks all,

    more or less confirms the conclusion we reached.

    Sorry for the delay in acknowledging - just got back from a week and a half holiday!

  • RE: User Defined Data Types in SQL Server 2005

    > How do you know that the DistanceFrom() operator

    > can't communicate with a map server?

    Now that would be fun, the first time the user does

    SELECT * FROM AllHousesInUSA WHERE...

  • RE: User Defined Data Types in SQL Server 2005

    > Displaying the type will be difficult in many tools

    > (probably will just show a binary)

    I've not had a chance to install sql2005 yet - do the tools...

  • RE: User Defined Data Types in SQL Server 2005

    Anyone looked at the performance implications of this? For example, if we had a few tens of thousands of records in that stock table, and needed the total of both...

  • RE: The DBA Whoops

    I remember doing this once before, and joking that there should be a 'WHEREVER' (pronounced with a rebellious female teenager accent) clause added to the language, and that or a...

  • RE: SQL Server 2000 Updates

    Thanks,

    Guess I was wrong then. How does one go about downloading these hotfixes? The MS web pages seemed to indicate you had to ask MS directly for them, but he...

  • RE: Slow down with parameter

    Adding a wildcard didn't make much difference (cost up to 0.266), however, switching from LIKE to '=' in the second query causes it to run as fast as the first...

Viewing 10 posts - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)