Forum Replies Created

Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)

  • RE: DBCC SHRINKFILE is not working as expected ??

    .. and, frankly speaking, i was pretty sure that truncating log with BACKUP LOG [db] WITH TRUNCATE_ONLY also marks log space as reusable...

    Regards,

    Slawek

  • RE: DBCC SHRINKFILE is not working as expected ??

    Hi,

    Actually I had this problem with two databases. Two out of seven on that server. One was in Full recovery model, and another was already in Simple, and on both...

  • RE: How to move log file ON-LINE ?

    That's what I was afraid of 🙁

    Thanks.

    Slawek

  • RE: DBCC SHRINKFILE is not working as expected ??

    Thanks,

    Funny thing:

    ALTER DATABASE [dbname]

    set recovery simple

    DBCC SHRINKFILE (2,TRUNCATEONLY)

    ALTER DATABASE [dbname]

    set recovery full

    worked fine... (I didn't wanted to use SHRINKDATABASE as I have pre-sized data files, which I didn't...

  • RE: DBCC SHRINKFILE

    SQL2008 ? No direct replacement I'm afraid. Change recovery model to Simple and then back to Full.

    FYI: List of discontinued database engine functionality in SQL 2008 is here:

  • RE: Parallel file operations

    .. and this:

    Well, if you convince me that fixing indexes will improve SAN performance, then I'll drop all my tests with multiple files and start fixing indexes 🙂

    was just a...

  • RE: Parallel file operations

    That's what I'm going to do.

    I was just not sure how many files and how configured would be the optimal config, because I was not sure how SQL assigns threads...

  • RE: Parallel file operations

    Hi,

    1. Regardless the database requires 70k IOPS or not leaving hardware operating at 10% or 25% of its limits is a simple waste of resources, especially I don't need to...

  • RE: Parallel file operations

    You are definitely software ortodox 🙂

    I have hardware which is capable of doing 800 MBPS and 70k IOPS (at least that's what manufacturer claims, which I don't believe) why should...

  • RE: Parallel file operations

    Hi,

    Well, if you convince me that fixing indexes will improve SAN performance, then I'll drop all my tests with multiple files and start fixing indexes 🙂

    My problem is that single...

  • RE: Parallel file operations

    Thanks GilaMonster - that was exactly what I was looking for.

    To sum up:

    Single worker per separate IO path, up to maximum of number of CPU cores or I/O affinity....

  • RE: Execute a Stored Proc as a background process

    Hi,

    Actually you may try to use Message Queueing system. The task will be to send MSMQ message in one procedure, and receive it in another. I know that outside...

Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)