IF that table comparison IS factual I would advocate we move to Oracle. We have both here and Linuxthough Oracle is hugely more costly, Oracle doesn't f**k us around as much as that table would indicate. We know what we are getting and what we have to pay extra for. The base platform for Oracle is very complete - compared to brain-dead marketed SQL 2008
Indeed current SQL server Express is better featured.
Without having been able to confirm what the comparison table states, I can believe it given MSofts whim to provide lobotomised, caste-derived, OS's with their XP and Vista products.
The systems fine with no users loggged in. Can we keep it that way ?br>