CLR and UDF

  • well "overkill"

    ?????????????????

    Whats the alternative then?

    because alternative people over here are mentioning are not working for me.

    "EXEC @sql;" doesnt work in a UDF and if put in a stored procedure, that stored procedure cannot be used as a derived column's formula?

    what to do then?

    please tell me.

  • IMO if you'd enabled database owner chaining, things might have worked from the start on.

    Post your clr-code and you have a good enough chance Jeff or someone else comes up with a classic tsql solution serving you even better.

    Don't show up with 'select *from tablea ' concepts,

    but post your actual code !

    btw I've had an instance go down because of huge memory consumption

    by a single CLR-proc. ( http://qa.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/FindPost463562.aspx )

    Most people seem to forget things could also be accomplished in a pre-CLR era. :w00t:

    http://qa.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic458140-386-1.aspx

    Johan

    Learn to play, play to learn !

    Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
    but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:

    - How to post Performance Problems
    - How to post data/code to get the best help[/url]

    - How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt

    press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀

    Need a bit of Powershell? How about this

    Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me

  • Muhammad Furqan (3/4/2008)


    well "overkill"

    ?????????????????

    Whats the alternative then?

    because alternative people over here are mentioning are not working for me.

    "EXEC @sql;" doesnt work in a UDF and if put in a stored procedure, that stored procedure cannot be used as a derived column's formula?

    what to do then?

    please tell me.

    With as little information as what you provided, I did try to show you. Take a look at the URL in my signature line... provide some data that easy for us to load using that format and like ALZDBA said, you'd be amazed at what can be done using just plain ol' T-SQL and with good peformance, too.

    Just as a side bar, Matt Miller and I have tested the heck out of various CLR vs T-SQL solutions... with the exception of some awesome RegEx replacement solutions that Matt came up with, the T-SQL solutions always beat the CLR solutions.

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.
    "Change is inevitable... change for the better is not".

    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)
    Intro to Tally Tables and Functions

  • The big question is - why do you want to do it in a User-defined Function to begin with? What are you using it for? What is the purpose for doing all this?

    Knowing what the data looks like is important - please do follow up on Jeff's request for DDL and test data, etc.... But - knowing the "big picture" is also really important. Trying to shove this into a UDF is going to severely limit your options no matter what - so figuring out why you feel it's important will help us come up with something that works.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Your lack of planning does not constitute an emergency on my part...unless you're my manager...or a director and above...or a really loud-spoken end-user..All right - what was my emergency again?

  • Ok, here is the code below. Let me explain once again.

    I have a bunch of tables in which data is populated daily, and data may vary, data may change for each "object_id".

    What i wanted to do is to create a table in which i would insert

    object_id,

    previous_date,

    currentt_date,

    columnName

    IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#T1','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #T1

    create table #t1(object_id int,date smalldatetime,data1 int,data2 int)

    IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#T2','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #T2

    create table #t2(object_id int,date smalldatetime,data1 int,data2 int)

    IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#changes','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #changes

    create table #changes(object_id int,thetable varchar(25),previous_date smalldatetime,currentt_date smalldatetime,columnName varchar(25))

    insert into #T1

    select 1,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 1,'01/02/2008',1,1 union all

    select 1,'01/03/2008',3,1 union all

    select 2,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 2,'01/02/2008',2,1 union all

    select 2,'01/03/2008',1,10 union all

    select 3,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 3,'01/02/2008',1,1 union all

    select 4,'01/03/2008',1,1

    insert into #T2

    select 1,'01/01/2008',25,1 union all

    select 1,'01/02/2008',25,144 union all

    select 1,'01/03/2008',30,1 union all

    select 2,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 2,'01/02/2008',1,1 union all

    select 2,'01/03/2008',1,1 union all

    select 3,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 3,'01/02/2008',55,1 union all

    select 4,'01/03/2008',1,1

    insert into #changes

    select a.object_id,'#T1','01/01/2008','01/02/2008','data1' from (select object_id,data1 as data from #T1 where date='01/01/2008')as a,(select object_id,data1 as data from #T2 where date='01/02/2008')as b where a.object_id=b.object_id and not a.data=b.data union all

    select a.object_id,'#T1','01/01/2008','01/02/2008','data2' from (select object_id,data2 as data from #T1 where date='01/01/2008')as a,(select object_id,data2 as data from #T2 where date='01/02/2008')as b where a.object_id=b.object_id and not a.data=b.data union all

    select a.object_id,'#T2','01/01/2008','01/02/2008','data1' from (select object_id,data1 as data from #T2 where date='01/01/2008')as a,(select object_id,data1 as data from #T2 where date='01/02/2008')as b where a.object_id=b.object_id and not a.data=b.data union all

    select a.object_id,'#T2','01/01/2008','01/02/2008','data2' from (select object_id,data2 as data from #T2 where date='01/01/2008')as a,(select object_id,data2 as data from #T2 where date='01/02/2008')as b where a.object_id=b.object_id and not a.data=b.data

    Up to this point is fine, working fine. Next what i want are two derived columns, "Previous_Value" and "Current_Value" which are defined as.

    Previous_Value:Showing the data in column "columnName" for "object_id" for "previous_date"

    Currentt_Value:Showing the data in column "columnName" for "object_id" for "current_date"

    So that i can get a table as shown in attached JPEG.

    "Current_value" and "previous_value" are derived. But tables are not fixed, columns to be obtained are not fixed.

    Any idea?

    I am really grateful to have such a group of nice and really helpful friends at such an active community.

    Thanks in advance.

  • just a first glimps for a simple start

    This select shows the values from within the same table...

    Concept may be a good start..

    select T1.[object_id], T1.[date], T1.data1 as T1_Data1, T1.data2 as T1_Data2

    , Tn.[date] as Tn_date, Tn.data1 as Tn_Data1, Tn.data2 as Tn_Data2

    from #t1 T1

    inner join (Select A.[object_id], A.[date], min(B.[date]) as Next_Date

    from #t1 A

    inner join #t1 B

    on A.[object_id] = B.[object_id]

    and A.[date] < B.[date]

    group by A.[object_id], A.[date]

    ) TheNext

    on T1.[object_id] = TheNext.[object_id]

    and T1.[date] = TheNext.[date]

    left join #t1 Tn

    on Tn.[object_id] = T1.[object_id]

    and Tn.[date] = TheNext.Next_Date

    Where T1.data1 <> Tn.data1 -- can they contain nulls ?

    or T1.data2 <> Tn.data2 -- can they contain nulls ?

    Johan

    Learn to play, play to learn !

    Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
    but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:

    - How to post Performance Problems
    - How to post data/code to get the best help[/url]

    - How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt

    press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀

    Need a bit of Powershell? How about this

    Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me

  • Well, Good. That was a really good start.

    This query can be used to observe values changed within a table.

    Welllllllllllllll

    My scenario is a little bit different. I need to put that in a tabular form, like the one as i showed in JPG attached. Please tell me if you guys are having any confusion of the scenario.

    Thanks.

  • Heh... WELLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!

    I'm pretty sure all you need is one select per column per table. It there where some rhyme or reason to the table names you

    wanted to attack, we could probably do this automatically by generating a little dynamic SQL to create a view for you. In

    the mean time, "we don't need no stinkin' CLR" 😀 And I added a "Table_Name" column because it made sense to do so...

    remove it if you want...

    [font="Courier New"]SELECT&nbspy1.Object_ID,y2.Date&nbspAS&nbsp[Current_Date],&nbspy1.Date&nbspAS&nbspPrevious_Date,

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp'#T1'&nbspAS&nbspTableName,&nbsp'Data1'&nbspAS&nbspColumnName,&nbspy1.Data1&nbspPrevious_Value,&nbspy2.Data1&nbspAS&nbspCurrent_Value

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbspFROM&nbsp#T1&nbspy1,

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp#T1&nbspy2

    &nbsp&nbspWHERE&nbspy1.Object_ID&nbsp=&nbspy2.Object_ID

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspAND&nbspy1.Date+1&nbsp=&nbspy2.Date

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspAND&nbspy1.Data1&nbsp<>&nbspy2.Data1

    UNION&nbspALL

    &nbspSELECT&nbspy1.Object_ID,y2.Date&nbspAS&nbsp[Current_Date],&nbspy1.Date&nbspAS&nbspPrevious_Date,

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp'#T1'&nbspAS&nbspTableName,&nbsp'Data2'&nbspAS&nbspColumnName,&nbspy1.Data2&nbspPrevious_Value,&nbspy2.Data2&nbspAS&nbspCurrent_Value

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbspFROM&nbsp#T1&nbspy1,

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp#T1&nbspy2

    &nbsp&nbspWHERE&nbspy1.Object_ID&nbsp=&nbspy2.Object_ID

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspAND&nbspy1.Date+1&nbsp=&nbspy2.Date

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspAND&nbspy1.Data2&nbsp<>&nbspy2.Data2

    UNION&nbspALL

    &nbspSELECT&nbspy1.Object_ID,y2.Date&nbspAS&nbsp[Current_Date],&nbspy1.Date&nbspAS&nbspPrevious_Date,

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp'#T2'&nbspAS&nbspTableName,&nbsp'Data1'&nbspAS&nbspColumnName,&nbspy1.Data1&nbspPrevious_Value,&nbspy2.Data1&nbspAS&nbspCurrent_Value

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbspFROM&nbsp#T2&nbspy1,

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp#T2&nbspy2

    &nbsp&nbspWHERE&nbspy1.Object_ID&nbsp=&nbspy2.Object_ID

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspAND&nbspy1.Date+1&nbsp=&nbspy2.Date

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspAND&nbspy1.Data1&nbsp<>&nbspy2.Data1

    UNION&nbspALL

    &nbspSELECT&nbspy1.Object_ID,y2.Date&nbspAS&nbsp[Current_Date],&nbspy1.Date&nbspAS&nbspPrevious_Date,

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp'#T2'&nbspAS&nbspTableName,&nbsp'Data2'&nbspAS&nbspColumnName,&nbspy1.Data2&nbspPrevious_Value,&nbspy2.Data2&nbspAS&nbspCurrent_Value

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbspFROM&nbsp#T2&nbspy1,

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp#T2&nbspy2

    &nbsp&nbspWHERE&nbspy1.Object_ID&nbsp=&nbspy2.Object_ID

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspAND&nbspy1.Date+1&nbsp=&nbspy2.Date

    &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbspAND&nbspy1.Data2&nbsp<>&nbspy2.Data2

    ORDER&nbspBY&nbspTableName,ColumnName,[Current_Date][/font]

    Do notice that all you had to do was study ALZDBA's code a bit and you probably would have come to the

    same conclusion. 😉

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.
    "Change is inevitable... change for the better is not".

    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)
    Intro to Tally Tables and Functions

  • Indeed, if you know you always have to compare data that strictly

    defers 1 day, use the join with y1.Date + 1 = y2.Date

    and don't use the "dynamic"

    inner join ( Select A.[object_id]

    , A.[date]

    , min(B.[date]) as Next_Date

    from #t1 A

    inner join #t1 B

    on A.[object_id] = B.[object_id]

    and A.[date] < B.[date]

    group by A.[object_id]

    , A.[date]

    ) TheNext

    on T1.[object_id] = TheNext.[object_id]

    and T1.[date] = TheNext.[date]

    Johan

    Johan

    Learn to play, play to learn !

    Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
    but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:

    - How to post Performance Problems
    - How to post data/code to get the best help[/url]

    - How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt

    press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀

    Need a bit of Powershell? How about this

    Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me

  • woww!

    you guys are awesome.

    This really puts me into thinking about some alternatives like creating views 🙂

    There are a few restrictions. I don't know whether they are really some restrictions/problems or i am taking them like that.

    Firstly. Columns are not just as Data1,Data2. They are just samples. In fact, i am having hundreds of columns in each of nearly eight tables. An audit of all those needs to be done, and why a fixed view cant work is that "columns keep on adding dynamically". However, one plus point is that number of tables keep fixed. ie. they are eight.

    So, do you think the solution provided there can work for the scenario where there are columns being added dynamically??

    Thanks in advance guys.

  • Executing it for 50 columns took me 2 minutes. You can estimate the time taken for say 1000 columns.

    I cannot keep the user waiting for that long. Thats why i needed the system where columnName, tableName, and the dates between which the change occurred in a table, and then get values for those columns, dates and objects only.

    Thats why, i do need a derived column that extracts the values of "those" columns from "those" tables!!!

    I think scenario is little more clear now!!!

  • you could start with the using the new sql2005 except join

    then unpivot the resultset

    and then check for the differences.

    remarks: datatypes will get converted to varchar(max)

    (I did put max , but you know the impact 😉 so restrict it as much as you can)

    IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#T1','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #T1

    create table #t1(object_id int,date smalldatetime,data1 int,data2 int)

    IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#T2','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #T2

    create table #t2(object_id int,date smalldatetime,data1 int,data2 int)

    IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#changes','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #changes

    create table #changes(object_id int,thetable varchar(25),previous_date smalldatetime,currentt_date smalldatetime,columnName varchar(25))

    insert into #T1

    select 1,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 1,'01/02/2008',1,1 union all

    select 1,'01/03/2008',3,1 union all

    select 2,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 2,'01/02/2008',2,1 union all

    select 2,'01/03/2008',1,10 union all

    select 3,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 3,'01/02/2008',1,1 union all

    select 4,'01/03/2008',1,1

    insert into #T2

    select 1,'01/01/2008',25,1 union all

    select 1,'01/02/2008',25,144 union all

    select 1,'01/03/2008',30,1 union all

    select 2,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 2,'01/02/2008',1,1 union all

    select 2,'01/03/2008',1,1 union all

    select 3,'01/01/2008',1,1 union all

    select 3,'01/02/2008',55,1 union all

    select 4,'01/03/2008',1,1

    IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#Tc','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #Tc

    create table #Tc(SourceTable sysname not null, [object_id] int,date smalldatetime,data1 int,data2 int)

    insert into #Tc

    Select 'ChangedT1vsT2', *

    from (Select T1.*

    from #t1 T1

    except (select * from #t2)

    ) ChangedRowsForT1

    insert into #Tc

    Select 'ChangedT2vsT1', *

    from (Select T2.*

    from #t2 T2

    except (select * from #t1)

    ) ChangedRowsForT2

    Declare @myUnpivot varchar(Max)

    set @myUnpivot = ''

    Select @myUnpivot = @myUnpivot

    + case when @myUnpivot = '' then ''

    else ' Union All ' end

    + 'SELECT SourceTable, [object_id], [date], ''' + name +''' as TheColumn, convert(varchar(max), [' + name +'] ) as TheValue

    FROM #Tc'

    from tempdb.sys.columns

    where [object_id] = OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#Tc','U')

    and name not in ( 'SourceTable', 'object_id', 'date' )

    print @myUnpivot

    IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#T_unpvt','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #T_unpvt

    create table #T_unpvt ( SourceTable sysname not null, [object_id] int,date smalldatetime,TheColumn varchar(128), TheValue varchar(max) )

    --Unpivot the table.

    exec ( 'insert into #T_unpvt ' + @myUnpivot )

    Select *

    from #T_unpvt

    All you need to do now, is replace

    Select * from #T_unpvt

    by the propper change detection query :w00t:

    Will this do the job for you ?

    Johan

    Learn to play, play to learn !

    Dont drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ...
    but keeping both feet on the ground wont get you anywhere :w00t:

    - How to post Performance Problems
    - How to post data/code to get the best help[/url]

    - How to prevent a sore throat after hours of presenting ppt

    press F1 for solution, press shift+F1 for urgent solution 😀

    Need a bit of Powershell? How about this

    Who am I ? Sometimes this is me but most of the time this is me

  • In fact, i am having hundreds of columns in each of nearly eight tables.

    I'm all done taking pot shots at a problem that keeps changing... Please, clearly define the problem just once...

    --Jeff Moden


    RBAR is pronounced "ree-bar" and is a "Modenism" for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
    First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code:
    ________Stop thinking about what you want to do to a ROW... think, instead, of what you want to do to a COLUMN.
    "Change is inevitable... change for the better is not".

    Helpful Links:
    How to post code problems
    How to Post Performance Problems
    Create a Tally Function (fnTally)
    Intro to Tally Tables and Functions

  • i am sorry for missing that point out that there are hundreds of columns. i just posted two Data Columns just for simplicity, but forgot to mention the number of columns i am having. Sorry about that sir!

  • Guys!

    Any idea?

    Have i made the problem worse ?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 32 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply