September 9, 2011 at 11:57 am
Having the same problem.
Apparently there is a hotfix for SQL 2008:
Seems to be a known issue. You can try switching the Compatibility level back to 2005 to confirm
September 9, 2011 at 12:00 pm
FredFlintst0ne (3/10/2010)
Here's a puzzling table variable speed behavior that I can't explain.I have a user-defined table function that returns a small resultset (~200 rows).
The user-defined table function employs a GROUP BY in a query of a very large table
(say, 1,000,000 rows).
When I merely select from the user-defined table function,
the small resultset of ~200 rows is returned in ~5 seconds.
--psuedocode
SELECT myColumn
FROM udtReturningSmallResultsetFromGroupByOverLargeNumberOfRecords
(@myDateVariable)
However, when I try to insert this small resultset into a table variable,
the query below takes about 30 seconds
--psuedocode
DECLARE @tblVariable TABLE(myColumn varchar(50) NOT NULL)
INSERT @tblVariable(myColumn)
SELECT myColumn
FROM udtReturningSmallResultsetFromGroupByOverLargeNumberOfRecords
(@myDateVariable)
Does anyone have any ideas why inserting such a small resultset into a table variable (~200 records)
would cause a 6-fold slowdown? Lacking a good explanation, I can only guess that the presence of the table variable insert is somehow throwing off the optimizer for the user-defined table function select.
I should be more specific. If I run a similar query to the above in 2005, it returns in under 1 second. When I ran it in 2008, it took over a minute and a half. It seems to be a known issue and hopefully there will be a fix soon.
October 10, 2011 at 6:15 am
I had the same problem under sql server 2008r2 SP1 (both 32 and 64 bit)!
Start parameter -T4130 seems to solve the problem.
But i am wondering, because that hotfix (and so the trace flag 4130) is only documented for sql server 2008!?!
Or do i have overseen something?
Regards
Eyck
Viewing 3 posts - 31 through 32 (of 32 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply