Post reply

Transaction isolation

  • April 19, 2012 at 10:38 pm

    #1476410

    Stewart "Arturius" Campbell (4/19/2012)

    Agree, need more questions on this topic.

    Thanks for the easy question.

    +1

    Thanks!

  • April 23, 2012 at 8:21 pm

    #1477893

    Good back to basics question. Thanks for submitting.

    http://brittcluff.blogspot.com/

  • April 25, 2012 at 11:20 am

    #1479224

    We could probably use questions on not only isolation levels, but also their individual characteristics, from

    which allow lost updates vs. dirty reads vs. nonrepeatable reads vs. phantom reads, to snapshot isolation quirks like the Craig Freedman's marbles article points out, to which isolation levels can cause issues with replication or result in errors, per MSDN articles.

    Choosing the best compromise for isolation level can take some thought.

  • May 1, 2012 at 8:36 am

    #1481816

    Great and easy question that covers an interesting topic on data consistency. Thanks.

  • May 7, 2012 at 2:28 am

    #1483993

    iep, it is about: READ UNCOMMITTED, READ COMMITTED, REAPEATABLE READ, SNAPSHOT and SERIALIZABLE, isn't it

    thanks for the question

    Iulian

Viewing 5 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply