Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)

  • RE: Enhanced Variable Declaration in SQL Server 2005 Mode

    I understand your overall point.

    behave as if you were a lower version when running queries in this DB

    I would argue that SQL Server is not doing this since the query...

  • RE: Enhanced Variable Declaration in SQL Server 2005 Mode

    OK, thanks for the response. I guess there are two potential views on this setting:

    1) Functionality that has been deprecated (or changed) in a newer version will be reverted...

  • RE: Enhanced Variable Declaration in SQL Server 2005 Mode

    Is there a list of these partially backwards compatible functionality changes documented anywhere?

  • RE: Enhanced Variable Declaration in SQL Server 2005 Mode

    Agreed that it is not optimal. However, that is a business decision and I have to deal with the current situation. There are technical reasons that an upgrade...

  • RE: Large Table Setup

    philcart (10/29/2007)


    With more relevant field names we can get an idea of what sort of data is stored in them.

    One thing I see a lot of is duplicate address fields...

  • RE: Large Table Setup

    Grant Fritchey (10/29/2007)


    Honestly, one table... Why put it into a relational data management system? Assuming at least a good primary key, this can be accessed faster from a file than...

  • RE: Large Table Setup

    philcart (10/29/2007)


    :w00t::sick::unsure:

    Presuming the field names have been changed to protect the innocent, how about posting something a little less generic and we might be able to steer you towards a...

  • RE: linked server name

    I realize this is an older thread...but came across while looking up some info about Aliases and Linked Servers.  One of the main reasons to use this approach was as...

  • RE: Insert From Remote SProc using Linked Servers

    Michael,

    Thanks for your reply.  I have the SET XACT_ABORT statement in the stored procs.  Does not help.  The remote stored procedure returns a resultset after some complex processing.  I can...

  • RE: Insert From Remote SProc using Linked Servers

    David,

    Thanks for the reply.  I have seen a number of articles on the issues with DTC Security changes with Windows XP/2003 and how to change the security settings to work with...

  • RE: Constraints Missing from Transactional Replication

    racosta,

    It was not created with the NOT FOR REPLICATION property.  I don't think that is even possible since the "NOT FOR REPLICATION" property only applies to IDENTITY Columns, Check Constraints & Foreign...

  • RE: Transactional Replication Synchronization Issues

    I thought of that as well.  I ran a trace on the Source server (Publisher) and the Destination server (Subscriber).  The trace on the Subscriber shows the sp_MINS_XXX calls being...

  • RE: Suspect Database Issue

    Thanks for all the feedback.

    I could not do a database detach because the database is setup for replication.

    I ended up restoring an older version of the database and all is...

  • RE: Suspect Database Issue

    We do not have a Backup Application running on this server that looks at the database files. Also, we have disabled the Anti-Virus program, but we are still getting...

  • RE: Suspect Database Issue

    I have tried running sp_resetstatus(DBNAME) and then restarting SQL Server...did not help. I have also tried running sp_resetstatus(DBNAME) and then DBCC DBRECOVER(DBNAME) and I get the same error as...

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 20 total)