Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 224 total)
So...with no responses maybe I should assume that no one else is trying to put as much on one workstation - or that no one else has been sucessful?
September 25, 2006 at 7:08 am
SQL 7.00.1063
Yes, I use linked servers via OLDEB (other SQL boxes) and ODBC (AS400).
No - I can't immediately retire the box or upgrade it.
Thanksf or the info. RH
September 5, 2006 at 8:37 am
Thanks for the link. It is not a direct hit because this server only has 51 databases, not 500. But, you never know. I will keep an eye on that...
September 5, 2006 at 7:45 am
Yes. The same way maintenance jobs are able to write history to files in the log directory. I'm curious if someone knows how SQL Server is doing that and if...
July 5, 2006 at 10:56 am
Yep, I completely spaced on the PK constraint check... It was traversing PK_Heap for every insert to verify its uniqueness. Also, thanks for pointing out...
June 29, 2006 at 7:43 am
Also, those 1057 batches tracked by Profiler occurred in just 40 seconds. RH
June 13, 2006 at 7:37 am
While I would still love to hear exactly what the TASK MANAGER is here under the CMD column, it turns out to not have anything to do with my issue. ...
June 13, 2006 at 7:35 am
I found what I needed. From the Microsoft website...
"...Microsoft SQL Server Standard edition will run on a four-processor server with dual-core processors, utilizing all cores on the processors, without requiring...
May 31, 2006 at 10:47 am
a,
I'm no expert on mainframes, but I believe mainframes are traditionally considered to be very large scale servers exclusively accessed by dumb terminals. I think Steve's example speaks more to...
May 31, 2006 at 7:37 am
Luis, there are lots of reasons for and against virtualization. And, I would agree, that virtualization may in fact introduce as much new overhead and maintenance time as it mitigates. ...
May 31, 2006 at 7:05 am
Interesting. Thanks for all the info. I have been curious about this because I am concerned about the new over-head being introduced into our DB designs since the advent of...
May 15, 2006 at 7:57 am
Ed, I'll admit that I am a bit confused by your response. The two scenerios I described above were two different scenerios(I intended them to be opposing) that I had rattling...
May 15, 2006 at 6:58 am
Part of my confusion... This is from BOL:
"For a clustered index, sysindexes.root points to the top of the clustered index. SQL Server navigates down the index to find the row...
May 10, 2006 at 3:24 pm
David, based on your response, it looks like Scenerio 2 is correct.
Essentially, the intermediate pages will be traversed (paged into memory and processed) based on the values of ID1...
May 10, 2006 at 3:18 pm
Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 224 total)