PowerShell

Technical Article

RE: Alternatives to ms-access linked tables to SQL2000

  • Reply

Anything with similar power will probably have similar liabilities. I'd recommend against Query Analyzer, for some reason users find it pretty daunting. When you say edit, is it just find a single row and edit, or they apply update queries? If the requirements are simple enough, you could throw together a small custom app that […]

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2003-07-23

1 reads

Technical Article

RE: Help Reqd for Optimization

  • Reply

I am not at all using any kinda of Transactions. Cursors are important for me as I need to fetch rows, calculate the output and update them. It would not be possible to send you the codes at this hour as the codes are at my office server. quote: I hat eto say it, but […]

2003-07-23

1 reads

Technical Article

RE: How do I decide, why index here and not there?

  • Reply

Actually, sounds like you need an OLAP solution since the data is for reporting only and will be read-only after the initial load. Check out MS OLAP services or the forum on this site for Analysis Services. -- If you don't want to go that route, I'd post the schema and a little clearer explanation […]

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2003-07-21

Technical Article

RE: SQL Newie needs help

  • Reply

Hi Jigsam, quote: So it is possible its just hard to do and time consuming? An SQL insert statement couldnt just chuck it where i want it? so you want to maintain some kind of identity. It is possible to do the job on your own or let SQL Server manage this. Some days ago […]

2003-07-21

Technical Article

RE: Failed restore

  • Reply

quote: RESTORE LOG test_1c FROM disk='D:\ONEC\ONEC.TLF' WITH RECOVERY -- restore failed: The problem comes from last restore log statement. You have to add "FILE = file_number" option to indicate which backup set from 'D:\ONEC\ONEC.TLF' to be restored. You can use RESTORE HEADERONLY to find out. In your case, it should be 5. The complete restore […]

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2003-07-18

1 reads

Technical Article

RE: Windows 2000 SP4 and SQL Server 2000

  • Reply

Procrastinators - here is your justification for postponing installation of W2K SP4: http://www.w2knews.com/anecdotes.htm. Note that 2 post SP SQL Server problems are mentioned along with a successful multi-server upgrade. I guess I should never entertain the thought of installing a MS SP unless it ends in a letter. Regards, Sandman

You rated this post out of 5. Change rating

2003-07-16

2 reads

Blogs

SQL Saturday Boston 2024 Slides

By

Thanks to everyone that came to my talks. Slides are below. Best Practices for...

Small Data SF 2024

By

I can’t remember how I heard about Small Data SF 2024, but it caught...

A New Word: Moledro

By

moledro – n. a feeling of resonant connection with an author or artist you’ll...

Read the latest Blogs

Forums

7 sept, scheduled book

By philip.scott

Comments posted to this topic are about the item 7 sept, scheduled book

7 sept, schedlued article

By philip.scott

Comments posted to this topic are about the item 7 sept, schedlued article

6 sept, published book

By philip.scott

Comments posted to this topic are about the item 6 sept, published book

Visit the forum

Question of the Day

Azure Data Lake Storage Gen 2

Azure Data Lake Storage Gen 2 is built on ...?

See possible answers