July 7, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Mine comes down to interviewing certified and non certified dba's - I remember one who had a number of certifications in both o/s and sql - I asked how to configure extra memory ( sql 2000 ) e.g. I've just put 16gb ram in the server what do you do to get sql server to use it and then how do you check sql server is actually using the memory? I have no recollection of anyone ever being able to answer this question correctly. I was told by one mcdba that awe was an operating system.
[font="Comic Sans MS"]The GrumpyOldDBA[/font]
www.grumpyolddba.co.uk
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/grumpyolddba/
July 8, 2008 at 4:18 am
Brad McGehee posted a pretty good article about this topic:
http://www.simple-talk.com/sql/database-administration/professional-certification-for-dbas/
July 8, 2008 at 4:46 am
Yep... same ol' stuff, too! Basically a summary of everything that everyone has spoken of so far except how lame some (supposedly) certified folks "real skills" actually are.
For example... I just saw some certified "professional" with both the Dev and DB certs along with a couple of other in his signature line actually recommend shrinking a database every weekend. The Certs did that person absolutely no good for real world work and would crash and burn in a simple technical interview. What that proves to me, yet again, is that anyone can study for and pass the certification test.
On second thought... maybe that person is lying... I've gotta go look them up and see if they're actually certified or not. Heh... this could be a lot of fun... might get the chance to fire off several porkchops on this one! 😛
--Jeff Moden
July 8, 2008 at 4:58 am
Jeff,
Was it a test DB with space issues? Dunno why anyone would want do do that....
Mark
July 8, 2008 at 5:00 am
That's kinda scary... was a while ago I took those exams, but I know there were questions about AWE, /3gb and max server memory on the exams I took....
July 8, 2008 at 5:04 am
I have to wonder if the people you're seeing are the exceptions or the rule....
I know one certified person who I worked with that didn't have a clue, and about 10 who were pretty good.
With the one that was bad it was more of a common sense and communications issue.. she had little common sense and didn't communicate well with the rest of the group. She eventually was fired for not being able to get the job done.
July 8, 2008 at 5:11 am
Mark Horninger (7/8/2008)
Jeff,Was it a test DB with space issues? Dunno why anyone would want do do that....
Mark
I think it was a posting on these forums. Stick around here and you'll see worse...
Just to stir things a bit, what's the opinion of the general skill level in our industry (ignoring certified/not certified)?
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 8, 2008 at 5:47 am
GilaMonster (7/8/2008)
Just to stir things a bit, what's the opinion of the general skill level in our industry (ignoring certified/not certified)?
Based on what I've seen in real life at work...
5% Newbie
60% casual knowledge
10% good knowledge
5% DBA quality
5% Developer quality
5% Hybrid quality
10% Stupid or dangerous or both
--Jeff Moden
July 8, 2008 at 5:49 am
GilaMonster (7/8/2008)
Mark Horninger (7/8/2008)
Jeff,Was it a test DB with space issues? Dunno why anyone would want do do that....
Mark
I think it was a posting on these forums. Stick around here and you'll see worse...
Yep... it was... you know which one...
--Jeff Moden
July 8, 2008 at 5:52 am
Mark Horninger (7/8/2008)
Jeff,Was it a test DB with space issues? Dunno why anyone would want do do that....
Mark
The guy didn't even take the time to find out... but doesn't matter... shouldn't automatically shrink a test db, either... only if something went wrong like an accidental cross-join and TempDB blew out of proportion... best thing to do even then would be to bounce the services so TempDB rebuilds.
--Jeff Moden
July 8, 2008 at 6:03 am
Mark Horninger (7/8/2008)
I have to wonder if the people you're seeing are the exceptions or the rule....I know one certified person who I worked with that didn't have a clue, and about 10 who were pretty good.
With the one that was bad it was more of a common sense and communications issue.. she had little common sense and didn't communicate well with the rest of the group. She eventually was fired for not being able to get the job done.
Out of the two people that I worked with that were certified, neither could hit the ground with their hat.
Out of the 16 people I've interviewed in the last 4 years, 2 where certified DBA's and if server knowledge were gasoline, they wouldn't have had enough to run a sugar-ant's mini-bike through a matchbox.
1 of the 16 I interviewed actually had a clue and I hired him. The other 13 were a mix of BS to Phd in CS or Mathematics... they should go get their college money back because the lights were on... just nobody home.
I've had the pleasure of working with a couple of GUI programmers that get it and wanted to learn everything they could about high performance, scalable SQL and I was happy to teach them.
I've also had the great DISpleasure of working with dozens of GUI and SQL "code monkeys" that I'll put into the "casual" category... they just don't get it... they just wanna get the project done and, although they cause no real harm, also cause the need for much tuning and rework later on.
So, am I meeting the exceptions? Not the way you think... I did meet and hire the one "exception"... the rest ranged from DILIGAF attitudes to down right dangerous.
--Jeff Moden
July 8, 2008 at 6:03 am
Jeff Moden (7/8/2008)
Based on what I've seen in real life at work...5% Newbie
60% casual knowledge
10% good knowledge
5% DBA quality
5% Developer quality
5% Hybrid quality
10% Stupid or dangerous or both
I'd probably scale that down towards the newbie in my end of the world, but mostly fits what I've seen too.
The problem I have with the certs isn't the certs themselves. It's with the people who think that a few letters after their name automatically makes them an expert or able to do the job.
That's why I recommend the cert exams (and the studying required) for personal growth, but that requires a person who's willing to learn in the first place.
Gail Shaw
Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server, MVP, M.Sc (Comp Sci)
SQL In The Wild: Discussions on DB performance with occasional diversions into recoverability
July 8, 2008 at 6:11 am
Now, that's something I can definitely agree with! 🙂
--Jeff Moden
July 8, 2008 at 9:59 am
Here, here!
I know that I wouldn't want to go through one, but I think having a certain amount of apprenticeship in our business would be a good thing. Now if businesses would just allow it.
Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/way0utwest
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
My Blog: www.voiceofthedba.com
July 8, 2008 at 10:37 am
I don’t pay any attention to certifications on resumes.
What I look for on a resume is relevant experience, and the ability to clearly explain exactly what they have been doing. Nothing gets a resume tossed in the “No” pile faster than misspellings, bad grammar, or the inability to clearly communicate.
If they can’t take the time to spell check a resume, I assume they won’t spend the time to check important code. If they can’t communicate clearly in writing, they will be a liability I can do without.
Having a good resume doesn’t get the job, but it might get an interview.
Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 75 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login to reply